Why study the immanentist tradition?
Latest posts
Recovering the immanentist tradition
Epicureanism and naturalism
September 29, 2017
How could material nature conceivably account for the order and purposes of nature, and, above all, for the adaptation of living entities to their surroundings and to their requirements for survival and…
September 29, 2017
The idea of the Muslim world: History and critique
by
Mona Oraby
The Muslim world: Political fiction and sociological fact?

Big history must reckon with the specificity of human experience, even if such an orientation yields more modest conclusions. The continued popularity of the idea of the Muslim world cannot be attributed to the elite alone. Today’s public spheres are saturated with political novices and seasoned politicians, academics, curious observers, and a vast range of nominally interested pundits, all of whom, it seems, have something to say about Muslims and Islam. Comment has never been freer and more pernicious. Any and all opinions find expression through more diffuse communication technologies than ever before. There are no guarantees that the provenance of a concept confines its use within the social networks that may have once given the concept meaning. If Aydın has written the history of an idea’s emergence, to what extent must its endurance account for a wider social field?
September 28, 2017
Book introductions
The Conservative Human Rights Revolution: An introduction
September 20, 2017
The Conservative Human Rights Revolution traces the origins of the European human rights system from the Hague peace conferences before the First World War to the adoption of the European Convention on…
September 20, 2017
Recovering the immanentist tradition
Lucretius and the immanence of motion
September 19, 2017
Lucretius was the first philosopher of immanence. It is he and not Democritus or Epicurus who holds this title.
September 19, 2017
The idea of the Muslim world: History and critique
by
Madeleine Elfenbein
Political Islam and emancipatory politics

Does it matter if you are Muslim? Lately it seems to matter very much. By drawing our attention to the presumptions embedded in the term “Muslim,” Elizabeth Shakman Hurd’s essay and Cemil Aydın’s book aim to help us think our way out of Islamophobic patterns of thought. As both scholars point out, these patterns run deep across the ideological spectrum. At the heart of both arguments is the concern that contemporary political discourse accords an exceptional status to Islam as a totalizing ideology (as opposed to a mere religion), and to Muslims as a transnational body of believers united in their worldview and political aims.
September 14, 2017
Load more