The New York Times Magazine ran a piece on Mark Driscoll, the pastor of Mars Hill Church in Seattle, dubbed by opponents as “the cussing pastor” and a proponent of Calvinist thought, fire and brimstone:
…[H]is message seems radically unfashionable, even un-American: you are not captain of your soul or master of your fate but a depraved worm whose hard work and good deeds will get you nowhere, because God marked you for heaven or condemned you to hell before the beginning of time. Yet a significant number of young people in Seattle—and nationwide—say this is exactly what they want to hear. Calvinism has somehow become cool, and just as startling, this generally bookish creed has fused with a macho ethos. At Mars Hill, members say their favorite movie isn’t “Amazing Grace” or “The Chronicles of Narnia”—it’s “Fight Club.”
…On that Sunday, Driscoll preached for an hour and 10 minutes—nearly three times longer than most pastors. As hip as he looks, his message brooks no compromise with Seattle’s permissive culture. New members can keep their taste in music, their retro T-shirts and their intimidating facial hair, but they had better abandon their feminism, premarital sex and any “modern” interpretations of the Bible. Driscoll is adamantly not the “weepy worship dude” he associates with liberal and mainstream evangelical churches, “singing prom songs to a Jesus who is presented as a wuss who took a beating and spent a lot of time putting product in his long hair.”
…Like many New Calvinists, Driscoll advocates traditional gender roles, called “complementarianism” in theological parlance. Men and women are “equal spiritually, and it’s a difference of functionality, not intrinsic worth,” says Danielle Blazer, a 34-year-old Mars Hill member. Women may work outside the home, but they must submit to their husbands, and they are forbidden from taking on preaching roles in the church.
Read the full article here.
The NY Times article is very good in its analysis, but I think one point that’s missing is more contemporary accents of Driscoll’s Church. In some respects it represents a crisis of incoherence facing Protestantism. Is Driscoll more charlatan than pastor?